You are here

Torrent thematic report

Edited on

12 September 2017
Read time: 4 minutes

Themes: links between the LAP and the Operational Programmes, peer review of Torrent LAP implementation, communication-responsible media reporting

Fourth in the series of Roma-NeT II transnational meetings, the Torrent meeting gathered all partners to work on the two main themes of the event and to see how Torrent’s cooperation with the Managing Authority has changed from Roma-Net I. During Roma-NeT I Torrent was struggling with establishing contacts with its Managing Authority, even if their Urban project was financed. Roma-NeT II brought an unprecedented cooperation, where the MA became an asset to the project, not only attending the Torrent meeting but even accompanying Torrent representatives to a meeting with the national Managing Authority in Madrid and ensuring more funding for Torrent.

The peer review examined two projects:

  • SERVICE OF DIGITAL ALPHABETIZATION IN THE DISTRICT OF THE XENILLET – Association Laura Vicuña

With 140.000 euros financing for 2014-2015 from the Urban Programme of Torrent, the project aims to increase training in the field of information technology to enhance the employability factors and to bringing information technology to different groups in Xenillet district. The project builds on real needs and is open to the whole population. Four courses (two digital literacy and two Office courses) were delivered until September 2014 in addition to an intensive course for young people with judicial measures. During the month of September three courses were launched (two of digital literacy and one of Office). The project is managed by Laura Vicuña  Association.

The project in figures:

  • Citizen Information Point: 500 people
  • Courses:
    • Digital Literacy:  300 Students.
    • Office Automation Courses:  75 students.
    • Internet courses:  60 students.
    • Workshop on career guidance and active job search online:  150 students.
    • Workshop on Social Networks as a tool for job search:  75 students.

The project was initiated by the municipality; the decision about intervention, directions was taken there on the basis of a study that identified deficiencies of people on the knowledge and use of digital literacy as an obstacle to social inclusion.  The project fits in larger frames, strategies as the National Strategy for Social Inclusion of Roma in Spain 2012-2020 also contains the promotion of training in new technologies (ICT) of Roma to improve the employability of beneficiaries.

  • PROGRAMME OF TRAINING AND READING IN XENILLET - Liga Española de la Educación y la Cultura Popular

With 111.570 euros financing for two years from the Urban Programme of Torrent, the project focuses on reducing school dropout and truancy with the more general aim to enhance education and to combat poverty and exclusion. The identified need behind the project is the lack of general culture and excessive lack of concern for both personal education and education of own children. General objective is promoting culture in general and reading in particular, making the community center an open and rich in resources for all ages, recreational and cultural space with a diverse educational and cultural offer that meets the needs identified in this population and responsive to the needs and lack of resources which has the population of the district. Ten specific objectives are defined. The project builds on needs assessment and taps in the Europe 2020 Strategy and relevant national strategies.

Results: 30 young people have participated in the program. Enhanced autonomy, self-esteem and individual motivation to study and working life of, in minimum 70% of young men / women served in the program were measured and reported. Five specific actions to promote social skills for improving coexistence were organized;  80% of participating students improved their social skills relative to the beginning of the course, it was assessed by direct observation of the educator and specific forms. At least 35 women have participated in the program.

Peers saw a contradiction between the 10 ambitious objectives and the budget of the project. Even though social studies brought up this need, people are mainly referred by social services, self-motivation is rare.

Methodology of the peer review

Partners carried out the Peer Review in 7 steps:

  1. reviewed the self-assessment template
  2. identified questions to explore with the project
  3. listened to the description of project actions
  4. questioned the presenting team
  5. a site visit allowed to see the project alive
  6. partners agreed on conclusions and recommendations
  7. feedback to the project team

Outcome of the peer review

Questions related to relevance and effectiveness were posed and while relevance, justification of the project, target group selection were analysed on the basis of the presentations and self-assessment template, it was too early to judge effectiveness  as the project was still ongoing.

The Torrent team first was a bit shocked and felt like being under a magnifying glass – the comments, questions were felt as criticism and we cannot say that they were not at least partly right.  Partners posed their questions, comments in a very direct way, concentrating on presumed and/or real deficiencies of the project and forgetting about or not emphasising enough the positive elements. Both Torrent project team and the partners needed a certain distance, time for contemplation. A separate session, without the project owners is also needed.

Our main findings were:

  • per review needs time, more than we had
  • we saw two good projects
  • analysis of needs was properly carried out
  • good project design was in place
  • committed people add to the quality of the projects
  • more work is needed on indicators – outputs vs. results
  • initial results are good.

Message to the project owners:

  • be proud of your projects and do not undersell them
  • links with other initiatives may scale up your project and bring wider impact

This is what Torrent learnt from the peer review:

« It is a challenge to spread good practice to the right people and to the right organisations.  There are so many stories, so many interesting details, so much to share – but how to do this well?   After the Torrent meeting we recognised that we are not investing the time or finding the best tools to effectively share our experience outside the partnership.  We now know we need to improve the way do this, and we need to make use of the many different techniques and methodologies to achieve it.   « 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agenda 

Torrent - 24-25 September 2014

 

Theme:  Links between the LAP and the Operational Programme

 

Tuesday 23 September 2104

Arrival of participants

 

Wednesday 24 September 2014

 

Time

Planned themes

08.30

Meeting of the participants at the hotel’s hall.

Bus to Torrent

09.00-09.30

Official welcome.

Amparo Folgado Tonda. Torrent Major

What do Roma children in Torrent want from the EU?

09.30 – 10.30

  • What could your M.A. do for your city.
    Juan Viesca.  Valencian Managing Authority

 

  • What could INTERACT do to improve your Local Action Plans: Good practices: Dissemination, Capitalisation/Indicators…
    Valencia INTERACT Coordinator. Victoria Palau

Followed by discussion - what do cities expect from their Managing Authority and how best to obtain it?

10.30 – 11.00

Coffee break

11.00 – 12.00

Round table  - Led by Maria José Muñoz Pretel

 

Subject - Different views about Roma Integration from a

  • Technician:  Álvaro Marzal. Social Welfare Coordinator.
  • Roma Young: Francisco Salazar. Roma Young
  • Roma Woman:        Ramona Miranda
  • Roma Man:        Eduardo Mendoza
  • Politician: Javier Noguera. Local Deputy. Torrent City

Moderator: Mª José Muñoz. IDEAT. European Technician and Maria Jose Pretel

Questions

  • What are the Key Messages from the round table?
  • What is the best basis for better engagement with Roma people in the future in Torrent?

 

12.00 – 12.30

Introduction to the Peer review of LAP implementation in Torrent.  

Ann Hyde Lead Expert

 

Programmes subject to Peer Review –

URBAN Program. IT Training / Kid’s program. Torrent City Council

 

12.00 - 12.30

Step 1 – Partners to review the Self-Assessment

Partners to discuss using the Peer Review criteria and agree questions? 

Consider - Is there a good fit between the expectations expressed earlier by Roma people and the local actions?

 

12.30 – 13.00

 

Step 2 - Presentations about the Projects from the implementers

Gloria Taberner Palop - . La liga de la Educación

Jorge Castelló Lerma. Laura Vicuña

13.00 –13.15

Step 3 – Thinking and questions to the Torrent Panel

13.15 – 13.45

Step 4 - Partners to discuss and draw some preliminary conclusions from the Peer Review

13.45 – 15.45

Lunch

Transfer to Xenillet Social Centre

15.45 – 17.30

Visits to URBAN Program. Xenillet Social Centre
 Kid’s program (reading promotion workshop)

IT Training (Certificates presentation )

 

 

Bus to the hotel

 17.45

Step 5 – Partners to discuss and agree conclusions and recommendations from the Peer Review for Torrent.

 

Dinner

 

Thursday 25 September 2104

 

08.30

Meeting of the participants at the hotel’s hall.

Transfer to Torrent

09.15 – 09.45

Feedback and findings from the Peer Review. 

Torrent response

09.45 -10.30

Pilot Delivery Phase / Reporting Progress and Challenges / Share action / Update on LAP actions  from each city /  

10.15 – 11.00

Communication – is it possible to motivate more responsible media reporting.

Ilona Moricz, Centre for Independent Journalism, Budapest

Partners to share examples of Negative and Positive Media Reporting.  Advice from and expert

11.00

Coffee

11.30-13.30

URBACT ongoing evaluation – input from external evaluators.

Pascal Chazaud, External Evaluator

15.00 – 16.30

Roma-Net Business and Future work programme,

Dates of future meetings and purpose.

 

 

Brussels meeting – set a date and theme. 

  • What are the key messages
  • How do we want to do it?

 

 

  What do we want from Almeria meeting – theme ?

 

 

Key messages for ROMACT Conference

 

 

Future Opportunities

  • DG Justice – Service Contract
  • DG Justice Call (Action Grants)
  • URBACT III – potential focus – subjects

 

16.30

 Conclusions

17.00

 End of the meeting

 

Friday  26 September 2014

 

 

09.15 – 11.30

 

 

            09.15

 

Bilateral meetings between cities with Lead Partner and Lead Expert

 

Bologna and Lead Partner – Bologna meeting  Torrent and Lead Expert – Twitter