Renewing Old Markets - Tool for Sustainable City Development
Edited on
09 October 2017Markets are as old as cities. And in each city and country they are as diverse as it can be. But in all cases, they create meeting spaces, business and jobs and they have a wide-ranging potential when it comes to implementing sustainability policies and new trends. Here are some tips from URBACT Markets network.
So, what came first, the market or the city? This question is similar to whether it was the egg or chicken that came first. Everyone knows that markets are as old as civilization itself, especially anthropologists, who have written extensively about this. My teacher Jesus Contreras told me 30 years ago that in the nineteenth century, markets were places where people met and organised weddings, but these days weddings are at function halls and discos.
Today, the perception that markets are places that young people don’t use anymore is beginning to change and maybe some marriages might be planned in a market soon. Going to a market is becoming trendy in some places. If you visit Camden Market in London, the average age of users is quite low, especially during the summer when it is overrun by thousands of students studying English in the UK and other tourists. One of the goals there is to recover Camden’s local buyers. But in Barcelona, where markets are primarily for food, young couples flood markets on Saturday mornings shopping for food. They are more and more concerned about healthy eating, quality, Zero km products and getting personalized services from traders.
In every city and every country, markets have different approaches based on what is inherent in their culture in an anthropological sense. During a recent visit to London’s markets organised by the UK partner in URBACT Markets, we saw the peculiarities of these markets. They are often privately run, part of public space initiatives, and are creating commercial business concepts with ‘authentic’ and real estate projects. Behind this private sector initiative, the public system is perceived to have a ‘laissez faire’ attitude aimed at not hindering initiatives that can generate wealth in the surrounding areas, unless they cause problems for the community, and that can benefit urban planning, services, employment, etc. Local authorities are often seen as regulators rather than facilitators in this context.
In Southern Europe, market management is usually done by the public sector. Torino, Athens and Barcelona are examples, with strong involvement from local government in terms of facilities and traders to ensure that this service is considered a basic part of the food supply that at the same time brings other benefits for the urban organisation. Public-private partnerships in these cases are weighted in favour of the public sector, while in the Anglo-Saxon world, it is often the reverse.
Probably, moving these two extremes closer together would be beneficial for both models.
But the differences are not only about the degree of public and private engagement, they are also about the type of market we want. In Southern Europe, the culture of food and gastronomy is part of everyday life and the main markets have this at their hearts. We have not seen the same in London and Wroclaw, where food is often one of the products of the market. Building selling points around the idea of health benefits in food, the benefits of local produce and km 0 products can also help markets to improve the welfare of those living in cities.
We therefore see very different approaches, but what is undeniable is that markets are very useful tools to transform cities, whether from the private or public or mixed approaches. They can facilitate the regeneration of neighbourhoods and social cohesion, create jobs and strengthen SMEs, distribute products and incorporate and promote sustainable practices or promote a type of healthy food and lifestyle, etc.
But there are some premises that must be taken into account when initiating a strategy like this:
1- Business must be profitable, in other words, markets must be commercially sustainable.
2- The development and improvement of markets, and consequently also the local environment, must be based on a shared commitment between traders and local government, both in terms of objectives and also actions and funding. We are talking about governance and strategy.
3- Local authorities should consider markets from an integrated perspective, taking into account urban planning and the implementation of environmental and social improvements along with economic benefits.
Watch out for the next episode ... To be continued
By Núria Costa - Lead Partner of the URBACT Markets network
Photo by Raging Wire on flickr
Read more:
URBACT Markets - URBACT minisite
Athens, an URBACT Food Metropolis – URBACT article
Submitted by URBACT on